League governance guide
How to Write Fair Madden League Trade and Dispute Rules
Good rules make the decision process predictable before a controversial trade or disputed play happens.
Define trade standards, not commissioner mood
State which factors matter—player value, age, contract, draft capital, competitive balance, collusion, and roster legality—and which do not. Require a short written reason when a trade is rejected.
Specify acceptable evidence
List the footage, timestamps, screenshots, game logs, and witness information that can support a report. Set a filing window and identify who can view sensitive submissions.
Separate analysis from authority
Automated analysis may flag or summarize evidence, but it should never issue the punishment. An identified adult commissioner or review panel owns the final ruling.
Give members a limited appeal path
Allow an appeal for new evidence, a rule misapplication, or a documented conflict of interest. Set a deadline and make the appeal reviewer different from the original reviewer where practical.
Keep an audit trail
Record the applicable rule version, evidence reviewed, decision maker, outcome, and amendment history. For trade workflows, see KnoBall's trade and draft management tools.
Want consistent rules, evidence, and decisions in one league workspace?